020 7219 5085/6215
For Media Enquiries Call 020 7219 2776
Jim Fitzpartick
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

03 Sep

By

No Comments

#GetBritainCycling

September 3, 2013 | By | No Comments

I would like to thank everyone who helped out with my #GetBritainCycling speech. Here’s what I said in the debate yesterday. Everyone who submitted comments by email or on jimfitzpatrickmp.org will receive a full response this week.

Jim Fitzpatrick (Poplar and Limehouse) (Lab): It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Eastleigh (Mike Thornton). I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Dudley North (Ian Austin) and the hon. Member for Cambridge (Dr Huppert), the co-chairs of the all-party group, of which I am a member, on the report. It is sponsored by The Times, which I congratulate too. I should declare that The Times is still in Wapping in my constituency, so there is a little bit of self-interest there. Other national newspapers—The Guardian and The Independent—have been trying to catch up and are supporting the campaign. My comments will be made as a Londoner and as a London cyclist, and will not necessarily reflect issues in other parts of the country.

I invited my constituents, through the social media of Twitter, Facebook and the East London Advertiser,to contribute to the debate by raising issues that they thought I might want to mention. I was staggered by the response—more than 50 people e-mailed or tweeted issues that are of importance to them. I am very limited for time and cannot name them all, but I will list some of them. Before doing that, I want to thank the cycle firms in my constituency, in particular Bikeworks, a social entrepreneurial group that does great work and made a running repair to my bike in half an hour last Wednesday morning to get me back on the road, and also Halfords and Evans, which are national organisations that support cycling in Tower Hamlets and in the community.

I will run through the list of issues raised by my constituents: keeping cycle routes clear when there are roadworks and parking problems; cycle superhighways not being up to the necessary standard—my hon. Friend the Member for Bethnal Green and Bow (Rushanara Ali) raised the incident of the Aldgate East fatality—with just a coat of paint on a road and nothing more; and lower speed limits, an issue raised by my hon. Friend the Member for Dudley North. Cycle training and education in schools was mentioned by several hon. Members. That is critical. I am doing an Industry and Parliament Trust Fellowship on logistics. I spent some time with TNT, which trains its postal delivery people to ride bikes. When they have down time, they partner local schools to train the kids there. If TNT can do it, the question to the Minister is this: is Royal Mail doing it? There must be other companies out there that could contribute, too.

Hugh Bayley (York Central) (Lab): Royal Mail is doing that. It has a cycle workshop in my constituency, which maintains 500 bicycles used by the Royal Mail in the Greater York area.

Jim Fitzpatrick: I am grateful to my hon. Friend for the extra time he has given me; I knew that somebody would respond positively on behalf of Royal Mail.

Questions have been raised about HGVs and the fear factor, a road deaths investigation board and improved statistics on serious injuries and fatalities. The Home Office and the Department for Transport have always resisted a fatalities inquiry board for road traffic fatalities because there are just too many of them, but we have to raise the bar and look more seriously at investigating more thoroughly the fatalities on our roads.

2 Sep 2013 : Column 83

Other issues raised include: congestion charging and road closures to force traffic to surrender more space to cyclists; advanced stop areas; earlier green lights for cyclists; blitz enforcement of transgressors—whether car drivers or cyclists—in advance areas; cycle storage; and mandatory helmets. I know that many people are opposed to making helmets mandatory. I am in favour, but it is not going to happen. The evidence against it coming from Australia and America is somewhat time-limited. If we get our kids using helmets in schools, they will graduate into wearing them.

Mr Ben Bradshaw (Exeter) (Lab): No one who is favour of cycling should be against encouraging people to wear helmets, but will my hon. Friend accept that the overwhelming evidence—not just in Australia, but from all over the world—is that where cycle helmets have been made compulsory the impact on cycling has been negative, and therefore the overall public health impact has been negative?

Jim Fitzpatrick: I hear what my right hon. Friend says and there is a cultural question here. I am sure we all watched the 100th Tour de France this year. All the way down the decades of historic footage, none of the cyclists were wearing helmets. Every Tour de France rider now wears a helmet. That is professional leadership. They are in the game of minimising and mitigating risk, and they give a lead to all cyclists.

Dr Huppert rose

Jim Fitzpatrick: If I have time at the end I will certainly give way to the hon. Gentleman, but I want to get through the points raised by my constituents.

The last two negatives raised related to fatalities and punishment to fit the crime. We all hear tragic stories from constituents about punishments that do not fit the crime. On the conversion of wider pavements, Boris Johnson certainly has that in London, particularly on the Embankment.

What I find fascinating is the counter-culture that comes through from my cyclist constituents. They complained about bad cycling behaviour and said that the cycle demographic in our country is mainly young, white, aggressive and male. That is why we do not “go Dutch” and why many people are put off cycling: they see a race track and do not want to join it. We need to address that problem, and the only way we are going to do so is through enforcement against those who cross red lights and pedestrian crossings.

People complained about cyclists who disregard the rules by wearing earphones; running red lights; crashing pedestrian crossings; not signalling whether they are turning left or right; not warning when they are overtaking; riding on pavements; using mobile phones; speeding on the Thames path; not ringing to alert pedestrians or other cyclists that they are overtaking on tow paths; swearing at pedestrians—some cyclists, like some drivers, think that they are entitled to a free run at the road; not dismounting in foot tunnels; not having lights; not having bells and not wearing high-visibility clothing. Cyclists are not perfect. We have to give a lead to

2 Sep 2013 : Column 84

cyclists to say, “We should show a better example in the way we behave, to ensure that drivers behave in the way we want them to.”

In conclusion, my wife Sheila and I visited Amsterdam and Copenhagen recently. There is less racing, more sensible cycling and a much wider demographic; there is a different culture. We must have that more varied cycling demographic in our country. My hon. Friend the shadow Secretary of State recently asked two questions of the Government. First, why do we have annual road and rail budgets to 2021, but not one for cycling? Secondly, why do we not have cycle safety assessments, similar to economic and equality impact assessments, for all road schemes?

My final question is about something that is raised in the report—I am not quite clear about the Government’s response—which said that we should have champions.

Dr Huppert: The issue with cycle helmets is that although they might save some lives, the countervailing loss of life from people not cycling and being less fit massively outweighs that. Indeed, one academic analysis suggested an extra 250 or so deaths a year net.

Jim Fitzpatrick: I am grateful for that intervention. That discussion needs to be had, and I am happy to ensure that we are raising it tonight.

My final question to the Minister is this. The report says that we should have national, regional and city champions. It is not clear from the Government’s response whether he is the national champion or not. If he is not, he should be. When will he recruit his regional and city-wide teams?

02 Sep

By

No Comments

Syria

September 2, 2013 | By | No Comments

I have been humbled and proud to receive so many messages of support regarding my stance on Syria. For those of you who missed it here’s my Commons speech below:

Jim Fitzpatrick (Poplar and Limehouse) (Lab): It is a pleasure to follow the right hon. Member for Chesham and Amersham (Mrs Gillan). She is obviously thinking hard about how to vote later, and I know that a lot of right hon. and hon. Members feel the same way.

I wish briefly to address the words of the corrected motion and the intent behind it, then I will turn to the Opposition amendment. First, however, I congratulate the Leader of the Opposition and the shadow Foreign

29 Aug 2013 : Column 1512

Secretary on effectively putting the brakes on a Government who were heading for military action this weekend. Of that I think the House can agree there is no doubt. My right hon. Friends have served the country and the Commons well through their actions, especially over the past 24 hours, and I hope that the Opposition will continue to lead in the same way and act as a restraint on the Government.

This is not the debate that the House expected to have, it is certainly not the debate that No. 10 was planning, and it is not the one that the media predicted would happen, but there have none the less been some excellent contributions. Despite the fact that there will be another debate and vote next week, this has been a useful exercise in testing the issues at stake.

I turn to the motion, which I have real problems supporting. That is not because I am a supporter of President Assad—I am not—but neither do I support the jihadist element of the Syrian Opposition that has been referred to in many contributions today. The wording of the corrected motion is important. The first and second paragraphs are straightforward in their commentary and condemnation. The third introduces the requirement of military action, and the fourth, fifth and sixth are very instructive. The fourth notes

“the failure of the United Nations”.

That is the softening-up line. The fifth notes

“that the use of chemical weapons is a war crime…and that the principle of humanitarian intervention provides a sound legal basis for taking action”.

The sixth mentions the “wide international support”, including from the Arab League, for action from the international community.

The right hon. and learned Member for North East Fife (Sir Menzies Campbell) said that tonight’s vote was not really important, because the important vote would be next week. I say to the Liberal Democrats in particular that if we get another debate and a vote next week, I predict that those words will come back to haunt them. The Conservatives are boxing them in by saying, “You’ve got to support military action, since the UN has failed, and we don’t need it anyway. We’ve got legitimacy, because the Attorney-General says so, and we’ve got international coalition support. It’s only the Russians and Chinese who don’t support it.”

Mrs Madeleine Moon (Bridgend) (Lab): Is my hon. Friend aware that the general secretary of the Arab League has tonight said on CNN that it shies away from backing western intervention, and that it would intensify anti-US feeling in the region? Those of us who have been sitting here all day have had a chance to google.

Jim Fitzpatrick: I am grateful to my hon. Friend for bringing that information to the House. It clearly demonstrates the fragility of the international coalition lined up behind the attempt to intervene militarily in Syria.

The Opposition amendment, it is fair to say, is at least more open and honest. However, from my reading it essentially endorses the same principle: if we address certain issues and if certain conditions are met, military action can happen. I do not believe that it should happen under any circumstances. The Opposition amendment is stronger and clearer, but whereas the

29 Aug 2013 : Column 1513

Government motion is explicit in its direction of travel towards military action, the Opposition amendment states that we will go there if the conditions in six of the paragraphs it lays out are met. My concern is about the end game and the exit strategy. There have been many excellent contributions to the debate—

Craig Whittaker (Calder Valley) (Con): Paragraph (e) of the Opposition amendment refers to

“precise and achievable objectives designed to deter the future use of prohibited chemical weapons in Syria”.

What are those “precise and achievable objectives”?

Jim Fitzpatrick: I have exactly the same difficulty as the hon. Gentleman—I do not know what they are either. I do not think that they are identifiable. I do not think that they are achievable. My objection, as I was saying a moment ago, is that there is not an exit strategy or an end game. There have been many contributions to the debate in which colleagues have said, “If we do this, that will happen. If we do not do that, this will happen.” Only one thing is absolutely guaranteed: nobody knows what will happen if we go down the road of military action. We have seen that too often in recent decades. The difficulty I have is the fact that we do not have an exit strategy.

In conclusion, and for the hon. Gentleman’s information, I have problems with both the Government motion and the Opposition amendment. Ultimately, I do not believe that either is able to achieve the honourable ends that both sides of the House want. I am opposed to military intervention in Syria full stop. To be honest and consistent on both questions, I will vote in the No Lobby against the Government motion and against the Opposition amendment.

21 Aug

By

No Comments

We must fight knife crime

August 21, 2013 | By | No Comments

DSC_0023I was shocked and horrified to hear the news a young boy was stabbed in Spey Street, Poplar last week. In one month this community has lost two decent people, who had their lives ahead of them, because of a knife. Both of them were keen boxing enthusiasts, Liam had just passed his driving test and Ajmol was due to collect his GCSE results this week.

When we hear about such tragedies our first reaction is to mourn the loss of life. Our next reaction is then to look at the cause behind these terrible murders, often with fear and anger. Knife crime has always been a problem but, no matter how much we hear that it’s getting better, when something like this happens on our doorstep it shakes the belief that our neighbourhoods are becoming safer.

We must, however, take solace in the community and police response to these tragedies.The Met’s reaction is certainly worthy of considerable praise.In relation to both killings officers have apprehended suspects within 24 hours and they’ve also been there to reassure people.The community, for its part, has shown that these crimes are a rare occurrence, committed by cowards who are the only people standing in the way of progress.

In the coming months and years we must continue the good work that’s already making our streets safer in the hope that one day stabbings like these will be a thing of the past.

http://www.wharf.co.uk/2013/08/jim-fitzpatrick-we-must-fight-.html

07 Aug

By

No Comments

I want your view on cycle safety

August 7, 2013 | By | No Comments

I’m calling on constituents to get in touch with their views on cycle safety in London ahead of a Commons debate on cycling.

MPs will be debating 18 Get Britain Cycling safety recommendations that could make cycling safer and more popular for millions of people in Britain when we return in September. After hearing from several constituents who have a strong view on cycle safety in the capital I want to put the views of my constituents, if I’m chosen to speak, at the heart of my speech.

A personal view on cycle safety from local people will be an invaluable resource going into the debate.

Instead of telling people what I’m going to say I want to hear from people and give constituents the chance be a part of this very important conversation on cycle safety.

The public can let me know what they think by tweeting @FitzMP, by using the comments section below or by emailing on jim.fitzpatrick.mp@parliament.uk. Please entitle all emails ‘Cycle Safe’. Comments used in the Commons speech will be credited.

31 Jul

By

No Comments

Dot Dot Dot

July 31, 2013 | By | No Comments

DSC_0199

Last week I got to see the fantastic Dot Dot Dot project in action. Dot Dot Dot lets people who do great volunteering live as property guardians in buildings that would otherwise be empty. I had the pleasure of meeting some of the guardians who deserve recognition for the fantastic community work they’re doing. More information here: http://www.dotdotdotproperty.com/.

30 Jul

By

No Comments

Cycling deaths are unacceptable

July 30, 2013 | By | No Comments

This is my latest column for local newspaper The Wharf:

Cycling has been on my mind this week. We all heard the tragic news that a man from Poplar had become the third cyclist to die on the city’s streets in three weeks; constituents have got in touch about the #CycleSafe Commons debate in September; and I’ve been taking advantage of the weather to cycle in to Westminster whenever possible.

All this has made me think of the huge discussion we’ve had on cycling for the last few years.

It’s because of this debate we now know what we have to do to make our roads safe and encourage people to get on a bike.

More investment, safer road design, lower speed limits, better HGV safety and driver training are just some of the many proposals which can turn words into action.

Cyclists also have a part to play, they must lead by example and abide by the rules as well as drivers.

And that’s what needs to happen now, we must reassure cyclists and people who haven’t got on a bike yet that we’re on their side and working harder than ever to make it safe.

It is unacceptable and wholly wrong that three cyclists have died on the capital’s roads in the past three weeks and this must change.

We’re only at the start of what could be a cycling revolution in this country.

There are only two things stopping us, the first is the legitimate fear cyclists have of our roads and the second is the work we must do on our roads to match the size of our ambition and reassure cyclists it’s safe.

30 Jul

By

No Comments

Search begins for Digital Hero in Tower Hamlets

July 30, 2013 | By | No Comments

I’m calling for local groups to enter the TalkTalk Digital Heroes Awards 2013, a competition that recognises and rewards people who are using technology to help their communities.

The awards, now in their sixth year, have provided funding and support to 62 organisations across Britain, including various charities which have used technology to help children and youth, the homeless and people with disabilities.

The awards, run in partnership with the Daily Mirror and charities Citizens Online and Go ON UK, aim to recognise inspirational people who use technology to benefit their local community. Twelve winners, one from each region of the UK – voted for by the public – will each get £5,000 to enhance their digital projects, with one overall winner getting £10,000.

Digital plays an increasingly important role in everyday life, helping to improve the community and encourage the growth of small businesses. Digital Heroes is an initiative which recognises people and organisations who have worked hard to champion technology and make a difference to their community.

I hope that projects in Tower Hamlets will be able to benefit from this year’s competition and I will be encouraging local groups and individuals to enter.

The awards are now open for submissions at www.talktalkdigitalheroes.co.uk and the deadline for entries is August 14, 2013. The Twitter hashtag for the awards is #digitalheroes.

30 Jul

By

No Comments

Jim Fitzpatrick MP voices support for Lung Cancer Nurses

July 30, 2013 | By | No Comments

Kay Rowe,Jane Drescher and Jim Fitzpatrick MPThis week I met lung cancer nurse specialists at an event in Parliament organised by the Roy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation (RCLCF) and the National Lung Cancer Forum for Nurses (NLCFN) .

I was very pleased to have the opportunity to meet the nurses who know first-hand how important it is that people with lung cancer receive the care they need.  Thousands of people are diagnosed with lung cancer every year and the care lung cancer nurse specialists provide is invaluable.

We must ensure that every lung cancer patient can see a lung cancer nurse specialist at every stage of their care and treatment.

I will be urging local services to ensure that patients with lung cancer are able to access lung cancer nurse specialists, to give them the best possible care to cope with the impact of the disease.

Designed and Maintained by
MRS Web Solutions

This website is funded from Parliamentary allowances.

Jim Fitzpatrick MP